monkeyflowermath

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any more copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach worries that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wishes to widen his variety, generating different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, fakenews.win like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the use of generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful however let's develop it morally and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to use developers' content on the internet to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its best performing markets on the vague promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them certify their material, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public information from a wide variety of sources will likewise be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for . It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.