For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a buddy - my really own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
Yet it was totally written by AI, with a few easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.
It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.
Several start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language design.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.
There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.
He intends to broaden his range, akropolistravel.com producing different categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.
It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.
"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect developers' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.
"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for imaginative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without permission ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very powerful however let's develop it morally and fairly."
OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.
The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".
He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is weakening among its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."
A government representative said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be offered to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.
But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of elements which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it must be paying for it.
If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It has lots of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.
But given how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure how long I can stay confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.
Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives
Alphonso Bustos edited this page 2025-02-07 08:15:00 +08:00